News
As Israel Pounds Gaza, BBC Journalists Accuse Broadcaster of Bias

BBC, the British public service broadcaster, has been beset by controversies since the Israel-Hamas war began
In the latest newsroom fallout over the war, BBC journalists say the corporation is failing to humanise Palestinians.
London, United Kingdom – The BBC has been accused by its journalists of failing to tell the story of the Israel-Hamas conflict accurately, investing greater effort in humanising Israeli victims compared with Palestinians, and omitting key historical context in coverage.
In a 2,300-word letter written to Al Jazeera by eight UK-based journalists employed by the corporation, the BBC is also said to be guilty of a “double standard in how civilians are seen”, given that it is “unflinching” in its reporting of alleged Russian war crimes in Ukraine.
Fearing reprisal, the journalists requested anonymity. The group does not plan to send the letter to BBC executives, believing such a move was unlikely to lead to meaningful discussions.
They sent Al Jazeera the letter as a humanitarian disaster in Gaza escalates, and as grim milestones are reached at pace. At the time of writing, more than 14,500 Palestinians have been reported as killed by Israeli bombardment, including at least 6,000 children.
“The BBC has failed to accurately tell this story – through omission and lack of critical engagement with Israel’s claims – and it has therefore failed to help the public engage with and understand the human rights abuses unfolding in Gaza,” the letter reads. “Thousands of Palestinians have been killed since October 7. When will the number be high enough for our editorial stance to change?”
Israel declared war against Hamas after the Palestinian group, which governs the densely populated enclave, attacked southern Israel on October 7, killing about 1,200 Israelis and taking more than 200 hostage.
Rights groups and hundreds of thousands of protesters worldwide, outraged by the soaring Palestinian death toll in Gaza, have called for a ceasefire.
The war has also divided newsrooms globally, with disagreements over how each side is being portrayed, the level of empathy shown to Israeli and Palestinian victims, and the use of language.
The BBC journalists said that across British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) platforms, terms like “massacre” and “atrocity”, have been reserved “only for Hamas, framing the group as the only instigator and perpetrator of violence in the region. This is inaccurate but aligns with the BBC’s overall coverage”.
The Hamas assault, while “appalling and devastating … does not justify the indiscriminate killing of thousands of Palestinian civilians, and the BBC cannot be seen to support – or fail to interrogate – the logic that it does,” their letter reads.
“We are asking the BBC to better reflect and defer to the evidence-based findings of official and unbiased humanitarian organisations.”
‘Humanising coverage of Palestinian civilians has been lacking’
The journalists appealed to the corporation to “ensure that the equal treatment of all civilians is at the heart of its coverage”.
They claimed that the broadcaster carefully portrays Israeli suffering by, for instance, telling audiences the names of victims, covering individual funerals, and interviewing affected families.
“In comparison, humanising coverage of Palestinian civilians has been lacking. It is a poor excuse to say that the BBC could not better cover stories in Gaza because of difficulties gaining access to the [Gaza] Strip … This is achieved, for example, by telling and following individual stories across weeks. Little attempt has also been made to fully utilise the abundance of social media content from brave journalists in Gaza and the West Bank.”
The journalists acknowledged “some strong isolated examples”, but said sensitively told stories about Palestinians were not “consistent”, particularly after the outbreak of war.
“It is largely in the last few weeks – as civilian deaths have exponentially increased and Western countries’ appetite for Israel’s attacks has waned – that the BBC has made more effort to humanise Palestinian civilians. For many, this feels too little too late, and shows that the positions taken by governments in the UK and US have undue influence on coverage.”
Al Jazeera interviewed two of the eight co-writers. Some of those behind the letter are people of colour.
“This organisation doesn’t represent us,” one of the co-writers told Al Jazeera.
“For me, and definitely for other people of colour, we can see blatantly that certain civilian lives are considered more worthy than others – that there is some sort of hierarchy at play. That is deeply, deeply hurtful because actually, none of us struggle to empathise with Palestinian civilians.
The journalist said that to them, it appears some staff members and senior reporters “don’t empathise as much with [Palestinians], as they do, for example, with Ukrainian civilians”.
The second co-writer Al Jazeera interviewed said they felt “sickened by the senseless loss of civilian life” during the Hamas attacks.
“I also felt a number of overlapping fears [including] that the coverage of my employer, the BBC, would fail in its duty to sufficiently interrogate this [Israeli] response or provide adequate context on decades of occupation.”
“My fears were immediately confirmed.”
The letter says that the BBC has organised “trauma support and listening sessions” for staff affected by the conflict.
“But for many of us – especially people of colour – the BBC’s coverage has been part of our distress,” the letter says.
Further critiquing the BBC’s storytelling, the journalists argue that while Palestinians have been asked whether they “condemn Hamas”, the same cannot be said for guests who defend Israel’s actions.
“[They] are not equally asked to ‘condemn’ the actions of the Israeli government, however high the civilian death toll in Gaza.”
On October 9, the BBC was criticised as lacking compassion over its interview with Husam Zomlot, the head of the Palestinian Mission to the United Kingdom, who lost several members of his family during the early days of Israel’s bombing campaign.
Zomlot, who does not represent Hamas, told presenter Kirsty Wark of his emotional pain. He listed the relatives who had been killed, describing them as “sitting ducks for the Israeli war machine”.
Wark replied: “I am sorry for your own personal loss. I mean, can I just be clear though, you cannot condone the killing of civilians in Israel, can you? Nor the killing of families?”
Zomlot, taken aback, replied: “No we don’t condone, no we don’t.”
"My cousin is not Hamas. These kids are not Hamas."
Husam Zomlot, Head of the Palestinian Mission to the UK, lost 6 family members amongst the almost 700 killed in Israeli strikes into Gaza.#Newsnight pic.twitter.com/Oih0hpWhxt
— BBC Newsnight (@BBCNewsnight) October 9, 2023
The letter also claims that the BBC is failing to provide audiences with important background about Israel’s occupation and the history of Palestinian suffering.
“For Israel’s bombardment to be considered ‘self-defence’, events must begin with the Hamas-led attack,” they said. “News updates and articles neglect to include a line or two of critical historical context – on 75 years of occupation, the Nakba, or the asymmetric death toll across decades.”
The Nakba, or catastrophe, refers to the displacement and dispossession of Palestinians between 1947 and 1949, when Zionist paramilitaries and then Israel’s newly formed army destroyed more than 500 Palestinian villages and towns. About 15,000 Palestinians were killed, and more than 750,000 were forcibly displaced from their land.
Today’s crisis evokes memories of the Nakba for Palestinians in Gaza, many of whom are descendants of those who were uprooted decades ago.
“The BBC has often called the ongoing conflict ‘complex’. It is no more complex than any other conflict,” the letter reads. “It is our job to cut through rhetoric and misinformation; to explain what is happening and what has led to this.”
A BBC spokesperson denied the allegations.
In an email sent to Al Jazeera, the spokesperson said: “Throughout our reporting on the conflict the BBC has made clear the devastating human cost to civilians living in Gaza and Israel.”
They added that the BBC is “one of the only news organisations” to have journalists inside Gaza, who have been able to provide “on the ground reporting”.
“This has included many stories of Palestinian victims and first-hand testimony from civilians, doctors and aid-workers in Gaza, as well as a Panorama documentary, featuring human stories from both sides,” they said.
“When interviewing either the Israeli government, Hamas, Palestinian representatives, or other leaders, we are robust, challenging and aim to hold power to account.”

The spokesperson also sent a list of examples of BBC coverage on the war, which included human stories of Palestinian suffering.
One linked to a documentary on October 23, with the summary: “Panorama reports on the conflict between Israel and Hamas. After 1,400 Israelis, including women and children were murdered by Hamas fighters, Israel promised brutal retaliation to destroy Hamas. More than three thousand Palestinians, many women and children, have already been killed in Gaza. Reporter Jane Corbin hears the human stories on both sides and asks what does the escalating crisis mean for the wider region?”
Israel has since revised down the death toll from 1,400 to 1,200.
The summary is an example of the kind of language in Western media outlets that many have criticised; Israelis are described as being “murdered by Hamas fighters”, but Palestinians are “killed” by a nameless actor.
BBC beset by controversies amid war
Since the latest Middle East conflict began, the BBC has been beset by controversies and claims of bias.
Last month, UK Defence Secretary Grant Shapps said the broadcaster’s descriptions of Hamas fighters as “militants”, rather than “terrorists”, was “verging on disgraceful”.
Hamas is designated as a “terror” group by the UK, United States and European Union.
At around the same time, the protest group Palestine Action claimed responsibility for vandalising the network’s London headquarters with red paint, accusing it of “spreading the occupation’s lies and manufacturing consent for Israel’s war crimes”.

Last week, the BBC embedded with the Israeli army to be shown around al-Shifa Hospital in Gaza, after Israel took control of the site. Israel has alleged that Hamas operated from the hospital – claims that many observers, including the BBC, have questioned.
Stephen Grey, a Reuters reporter, said on X of the trip facilitated by Israel: “Media should think very carefully about taking part in any one-sided embeds with any party. Today’s BBC report on al Shifa hospital, in which they were unable to speak to doctors or patients, left me feeling deeply uncomfortable.”
On October 24, a BBC correspondent based in Beirut, Rami Ruhayem, wrote to Tim Davie, BBC’s director-general, alleging that there are “indications that the BBC is – implicitly at least – treating Israeli lives as more worthy than Palestinian lives, and reinforcing Israeli war propaganda”.
On October 25, The Times newspaper, citing a BBC source, reported that staff had been “crying in the toilets” over the “distress caused” by coverage that they alleged was too lenient on Israel.
And over the weekend, Danny Cohen, a former director of BBC Television, said the corporation should be independently investigated over “management failures in its reporting of Israel”, as he accused a BBC journalist of pro-Palestine bias on her social media feed.
Fallout across global newsrooms
The war has led to bitter divides across other newsrooms, too.
An unnamed reporter at The Guardian, with family in southern Israel, wrote in the Jewish News that they felt disillusioned by the newspaper’s coverage and working environment after the Hamas attacks, claiming their colleagues were unsupportive.
“I think that Israel must defend itself. Yet when I say this, people will tell me I am justifying the murder of children. They will tell me it is a genocide,” they wrote.
Anne Boyer, a poetry editor for The New York Times, quit last week, ostensibly over the paper’s editorial stance.
Apparently taking aim at the newspaper’s language on the war, she said: “I can’t write about poetry amidst the ‘reasonable’ tones of those who aim to acclimatize us to this unreasonable suffering. No more ghoulish euphemisms. No more verbally sanitized hellscapes. No more warmongering lies.”
Jazmine Hughes, a writer for The New York Times, resigned after signing a solidarity statement that described “Gaza’s people” as “victims of a genocidal war”.
Journalist and illustrator Mona Chalabi, who works for The Guardian US and freelances for The New York Times, posted on Instagram on October 18 that The New York Times has “consistently mentioned Israeli deaths more often than Palestinian deaths. What’s more, their coverage of Israeli deaths is *increasing* as more Palestinians are dying”.
Meanwhile, at the Los Angeles Times, staffers who signed a protest letter in solidarity with Gazan journalists have been blocked from covering the war for three months, Semafor reported.
According to the BBC’s rules on impartiality, editorial staff “should not participate in public demonstrations or gatherings about controversial issues”.
News
Zenith Bank Wraps Up TechFair 2026, Reaffirms Commitment to AI development and Innovation in Africa

The virtual event featured global AI experts, government officials, technology executives and emerging innovators, with discussions centred on artificial intelligence, digital payments and Africa’s digital transformation.
LAGOS, NIGERIA – November 5, 2026: Zenith Bank Plc has successfully concluded the sixth edition of its flagship Zenith Bank Tech Fair, tagged Future Forward 6.0, bringing together global technology experts, policymakers, business leaders, entrepreneurs and innovators to examine the growing influence of artificial intelligence on businesses, financial services and the global economy.
Held on Thursday, November 5, 2026, the event adopted the theme “AI: Embrace or Extinct,” highlighting the growing importance of artificial intelligence and the need for individuals, businesses and institutions to adapt to the rapidly changing technological landscape.
The 2026 edition marked a significant milestone for the annual technology gathering as it moved to a virtual format for the first time, expanding opportunities for participation beyond the traditional physical event.
Global Technology Leaders Take Centre Stage
The event featured prominent international technology personalities, including Zack Kass, former Head of Go-to-Market at OpenAI, who delivered a keynote presentation titled The Next RenAIssance, examining the opportunities emerging from advancements in artificial intelligence.
Also featured was Megan Caywood Cooper, Founder and Chief Executive Officer of Caywood, whose presentation, Agentic AI in Finance – Closing the Capability Overhang, explored the potential of autonomous AI systems to transform financial services and business operations.
Other notable personalities featured in the programme included Kashifu Inuwa Abdullahi, Director-General of the National Information Technology Development Agency (NITDA), and Eleni Giokos, CNN anchor and correspondent, who hosted the panel discussions.
The opening session featured a welcome address by Dame Dr Adaora Umeoji, OON, Group Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer of Zenith Bank, followed by a founder’s message from Jim Ovia, CFR, Founder and Chairman of the financial institution.
The event also featured goodwill messages from Vice President Kashim Shettima and Lagos State Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu.
Discussions Focus on Agentic AI and Africa’s Digital Future
A major highlight of the fair was the panel session titled Agentic AI Evolution – Intelligent, Disruptive and Inclusive, which examined how increasingly autonomous artificial intelligence systems could reshape industries, financial services and business operations.
The session featured Kashifu Inuwa Abdullahi; Chinwe Uzoho, Regional Managing Director, West Africa, Network International; Ehia Erhaboh, Co-Founder and President of AI in Nigeria; Tolu Flosbach, Head of Artificial Intelligence at PwC; and Dr Ikpenmosa Uhumuavbi, Research Centre Lead and Reader in Law at the University of Greater Manchester.
Another major discussion, Scale, Secure, Sustain – Engineering Africa’s Digital Future, brought together industry professionals to examine the infrastructure, cybersecurity and policy requirements necessary to support Africa’s growing digital economy.
Among the participants were Jane Nkechi Egerton-Idehen, Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer of NIGCOMSAT; Dr Rita I. Sike, Director of the Financial Policy and Regulation Department; Fashola Shamsideen, Founder of Xdigital Services Limited; Abiola Laseinde, Convener of CIO & C-Suite Awards Africa; and Habibah Waziri, Managing Director of BGR Consulting.
Digital Payments and Financial Innovation in Focus
Beyond artificial intelligence, the 2026 Tech Fair placed considerable attention on the future of digital payments and financial infrastructure across Africa.
Mike Ogbalu III, Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer of the Pan-African Payment and Settlement System (PAPSS), delivered a presentation on Pan-African Payment Infrastructure & Trade Acceleration.
Deniz Oran, Head of Payment Partnerships at Google for Europe, the Middle East and Africa, was also featured in a session examining next-generation agentic and digital payment partnerships.
Another major programme highlight was the unveiling of Finopay, Zenith Bank’s flagship digital payment innovation platform, scheduled to feature a live interactive demonstration.
The discussions highlighted the importance of developing secure, efficient and accessible payment infrastructure to support cross-border trade, financial inclusion and the growth of businesses across the continent.
Zecathon and Young Innovators Highlight Startup Opportunities
The event also provided opportunities for emerging technology entrepreneurs through Zecathon, Zenith Bank’s innovation and startup competition.
The programme featured a business pitch competition for early-stage startups, a hackathon challenge showcasing technology prototypes, and a Junior Innovators Challenge designed to spotlight young technology talents and student innovators.
The initiative builds on Zenith Bank’s continued support for innovation and entrepreneurship through funding, mentorship and opportunities for promising startups to develop scalable solutions.
The event also featured specialised masterclasses covering AI governance, model risk, ethics and accountability, cybersecurity in the AI age, AI infrastructure, future payment technologies, fintech and traditional banking, as well as cloud infrastructure and data residency.
Zenith Bank Reaffirms Commitment to Technology and Innovation
Conceived by the bank’s Founder and Chairman, Jim Ovia, the Zenith Bank Tech Fair has evolved into an annual platform connecting technology professionals, entrepreneurs, investors and industry stakeholders to discuss emerging technologies and their impact on society.
Through Future Forward 6.0, Zenith Bank reinforced the importance of embracing technological innovation, developing local talent and creating opportunities for African businesses to compete in an increasingly technology-driven global economy.
Following the conclusion of the event, Zenith Bank expressed appreciation to attendees for participating in the 2026 edition and contributing to conversations shaping the future of technology.
The bank also looked ahead to the next edition, announcing its anticipation of welcoming participants again in 2027.
As artificial intelligence continues to redefine industries, the conversations and innovations showcased at Future Forward 6.0 underscore the growing importance of preparing Africa’s workforce, businesses and institutions for the next phase of digital transformation.
News
Janemichael Ekanem: Beyond The Creative Industry
Building Opportunities. Inspiring Impact. Creating a Legacy.
Introduction
Jane Michael Ekanem is known for her work in fashion, styling, and creative direction. But beyond the creative industry, there is another part of her story: a growing commitment to girls’ education.
In 2016, Jane supported a student’s education at her alma mater. What began as an individual act of support became the starting point of a larger vision, one that would eventually take shape as the JaneMichael Ekanem Foundation.
In this conversation, we explore the woman behind that decision, the importance of girls’ education, and what it means to turn a personal conviction into work that can make a lasting difference.
Jane, thank you for sharing the story and vision behind the JaneMichael Foundation.
The work ahead is about turning a belief in girls’ education into meaningful, sustained opportunities. And as this conversation reminds us, making a difference doesn’t always begin with something grand. Sometimes, it begins with the decision to show up.
To learn more about the Foundation, visit thejanemichael.com/foundation.
1. You’ve built a career in an industry that demands creativity, resilience, and constant reinvention. As you look back at your journey so far, what experiences have shaped the person you are today, beyond your professional achievements?
My journey has taught me that success is not just about what you build; it is also about who you become in the process. I have experienced seasons that required resilience, self-reflection, and the courage to begin again.
Growing up, I also understood how financial circumstances could affect access to opportunities. That experience has stayed with me.
Today, I think beyond personal achievement. I ask myself what I can do with what I have learned and how my experiences can become useful to someone else. For me, that is an important part of growth.
2. People often see the finished work — the brand, the projects, the public moments. What is something about your personal journey that you think people might not immediately understand, but that has influenced the way you see responsibility and giving back?
People do not always see the circumstances behind a person’s journey. I understand that having potential does not always mean having the resources or support to fulfil it.
That understanding has influenced how I see giving back. I do not believe support should make anyone feel inferior or indebted. It should help people move forward with their dignity intact.
Sometimes, what someone needs is not for another person to solve every problem, but for someone to help remove a barrier standing between them and an opportunity.
I am also a firm believer of winning as a community irrespective of the tribe, race or religion.
3. In 2016, you made the decision to support a student’s education at your alma mater. What did that support actually make possible, beyond the immediate financial help? And what did the experience teach you about the difference one opportunity can make?
In 2016, I returned to Girls Senior Academy, my alma mater, to support one deserving student. The initiative was guided by good character, academic commitment, and financial need.
Years later, the beneficiary went on to purchase JAMB forms for other students. That stayed with me because it showed how an opportunity can travel beyond the person who first receives it.
The church helped me, then I helped one student, and then she went on to help others. It reminded me that we may never fully know the impact of our actions. Sometimes, the most meaningful part of giving is what happens long after we have moved on.
4. Was there a particular moment when you realised that this was something you wanted to pursue beyond that first act of support? Or did the idea of building something larger develop gradually?
The vision developed gradually. In 2016, I was responding to an immediate need, without clarity on understanding how to establish a foundation.
But the experience stayed with me, particularly when I saw how the beneficiary extended the opportunity to others. I began thinking about what it would mean to make this kind of support more sustainable.
Life brought its own challenges, and I could not continue the initiative as consistently as I wanted. Eventually, I realised that if the vision was going to endure, it needed more than good intentions. It needed structure. That understanding helped lead to the establishment of the JaneMichael Ekanem Foundation.
5. Looking back at the woman you were when you made that first decision, if you could design an outfit for her today, what would she be wearing — and what would you want that version of yourself to know?
I would give her something beautifully tailored, timeless, and quietly confident, a little more modest and audacious with one unexpected detail. Something that says you can be intentional without having everything figured out.
I would tell her not to underestimate a small beginning simply because she cannot yet see where it will lead.
I would also remind her that building something meaningful takes time. The vision may come first, but the capacity to sustain it must be developed along the way.
Most importantly, I would tell her to keep going, keep learning, and trust that not every meaningful beginning will reveal its full purpose immediately.
6. Why is girls’ education a cause you have chosen to stand behind? What do you believe becomes possible when a girl has the opportunity to learn, develop her abilities, and make choices about her future?
Education expands choices. It gives a girl the opportunity to develop her abilities, discover her potential, and make informed decisions about her future.
My interest is also personal. I understand how financial circumstances can interfere with a young person’s education, regardless of their ability or determination.
Through the Foundation, our current focus is supporting deserving girls as they transition from secondary school into higher education. Our broader mission includes young girls and boys from financially challenged backgrounds.
I believe every young person deserves the opportunity to pursue their potential, and financial difficulty should not automatically determine how far that person can go.
7. Education is often discussed in terms of school fees and access to classrooms. Beyond getting a girl into school, what do you think she needs to have a genuine chance to learn, grow, and continue her education?
Every girl needs support that considers the realities of her educational journey. Beyond school fees, there may be examination expenses, registration fees, admission costs, learning materials, and other requirements that can become barriers. But most importantly, every girl and boy needs exposure and solid foundation in education is a drive way to that path.
The transition from secondary school to higher education is particularly important. A student may complete one stage successfully but struggle to move forward because of the cost of taking the next step.
She also deserves dignity, encouragement, and access to useful guidance. At the Foundation, we consider good character, academic commitment, and genuine financial need. As we grow, I want us to keep asking not only how we can help a student gain access, but how we can help create opportunities for her to continue.
8. Your late father used to say, “A good name is better than silver or gold.” Now that you’re building something intended to serve others, do you find yourself understanding those words differently? What does living up to them look like for you today?
There is a part of my story where I completely lost it all… the fame, the money, my house and business but what journeyed me back to building again were the good relationships I had built while climbing at the time. So yes, I understand those words differently now because I now see a good name as something that must also be demonstrated through action.
Building the Foundation means taking responsibility for more than my personal intentions. It means being honest about what we can do, managing resources responsibly, and ensuring that our decisions remain connected to our purpose.
It also means respecting the dignity of the students we support. I do not want the Foundation’s name to represent generosity alone; I want it to represent integrity and trust.
For me, my father’s words are a reminder that legacy is not just about what you leave behind, but the values your work continues to demonstrate.
9. Turning a personal act of giving into a foundation comes with a different level of responsibility. What has that transition made you think about in terms of consistency, accountability, and the kind of impact you want the Foundation to have?
It has taught me that good intentions are only the beginning. If you want an initiative to continue, you need structure, consistency, and responsible management.
The Foundation must be clear about its priorities, the resources available, and what it can realistically deliver. I also believe growth should be measured by more than the number of students supported. We must consider the quality of the support and our ability to sustain it.
I want to build an organisation that can continue creating educational opportunities beyond individual acts of generosity. That requires patience, planning, and the willingness to learn as we grow.
10. In a highly visible industry like yours, people can sometimes question whether an act of giving is genuine or performative. Have you ever had to think about that perception, and how do you make sure the work speaks for itself?
I think the most important thing is to stay true to the reason you started. When you are in a visible industry, people will always have their interpretations, and I have come to understand that you cannot build your life around trying to manage everyone’s perception of you.
For me, giving back is personal. It comes from my own experiences and an understanding of what access to an opportunity can mean to someone. I don’t believe every act of kindness needs an audience to be meaningful.
With the Foundation, my focus is on building something that can stand on its own values: integrity, accountability, and a genuine commitment to education. I want the work to speak through the opportunities we create, the way we treat the people we serve, and our consistency over time.
Ultimately, I believe intention may start the work, but integrity and consistency are what give it credibility.
11. For people who want to support the Foundation, what should they understand about its focus and the kind of contribution that would be most meaningful? How can someone help without assuming that impact always has to be financial?
The Foundation supports young girls and boys from financially challenged backgrounds, with a current focus on helping deserving girls transition from secondary school into higher education.
Financial contributions can help us provide educational assistance, but support can also come through relevant expertise, educational resources, professional guidance, and partnerships with organisations that share our mission.
I believe meaningful collaboration begins with understanding the need and being clear about what each party can contribute. We are building the Foundation thoughtfully, with the intention of developing its capacity over time.
This also an open call to anyone who believes in educational opportunity to learn about our work and explore how they might contribute meaningfully.
12. When you imagine the Foundation several years from now, what would make you feel that it is doing meaningful work? What would you want to be able to point to beyond the existence of the organisation itself?
I would want to see a Foundation that has grown in its ability to support students consistently and responsibly.
Beyond the number of beneficiaries, I would look at whether we are helping students navigate important educational transitions, building trusted relationships with schools, managing resources responsibly, and developing the capacity to sustain our work.
I also want us to think beyond individual scholarships. How can educational support become more consistent? What initiatives could help students and their wider school communities over time?
For me, success is not simply establishing an organisation. It is building one that can remain faithful to its purpose and continue creating opportunities as it grows.
13. Sometimes, people wait until they have more money, more influence, or more time before they help someone else. What would you say to someone who has the ability to make a difference today but keeps waiting for the “perfect” time?
I would say, start with what you can responsibly do today.
We sometimes imagine that making a difference requires significant money or influence, but contribution can take many forms. It could be sharing knowledge, making an introduction, providing a resource, teaching a skill or helping someone access an opportunity.
Of course, we must be realistic about our own responsibilities. But we should not assume that meaningful action must wait until we have everything we want.
My own journey with the Foundation began with one student, long before it became an established organisation. The vision grew over time.
You do not need to see the entire journey before taking the first step. Sometimes, you discover what is possible by beginning.
14. Your work in fashion involves imagining what something could become before others can see it. Do you approach the Foundation in a similar way — by holding on to a vision of what is possible, even when the steps to get there are still taking shape?
Yes. In creative work, you learn to imagine what something could become before it exists. But you also learn that a vision requires planning, execution, and the capacity to bring it to life.
I approach the JME Foundation with that understanding. I believe in what it can become, but I also recognise that good intentions must be supported by structure, resources, and meaningful partnerships.
I want to build something that can grow without losing sight of why it exists. For me, the challenge is not simply to imagine a future for the Foundation, but to develop the capacity to make that future sustainable.
Vision gives you direction. The work is in building what is required to get there.
15. If someone encounters the JaneMichael Ekanem Foundation for the first time through this conversation, what is the one thing you hope they understand about why it exists — and what would you like them to do with that understanding?
I want people to understand that the Foundation began with one person’s educational need, but its vision extends beyond one student or one moment.
We exist to create educational opportunities for young people who need support, and to build an initiative that can continue doing so responsibly over time.
The experience that began in 2016 reminded me that opportunity can travel. We are a system that believes in the power of positive ripple effects. We also believe in the power of community. We have to come together and create a lasting solution.
For those who believe in this vision, I invite you to read about the Foundation and explore how you can support through relevant expertise, resources, or partnerships.
The vision started with one person, but I do not want the story to end with me.
The JaneMichael Ekanem Foundation is committed to creating educational opportunities, inspiring impact, and building a lasting legacy.
Because sometimes, one opportunity is where a much bigger story begins.
Visit thejanemichael.com/foundation to learn more.
News
Big Battery, Smart Secondary Screen: Why the itel A300+ Should Be Your Next Smartphone

For today’s students and Gen Zs, a smartphone is more than just a communication device—it’s a study partner, entertainment hub, camera and productivity tool. From attending virtual classes and researching assignments to creating content and staying connected with friends, students need a phone that can keep up with their fast-paced lifestyle.
The itel A300+ is designed to do exactly that. Combining a 2.01-inch Smart Secondary Screen, a 7000mAh Ultra-Large Battery, and IP65 dust and water resistance, it delivers practical features that make everyday student life easier.
Power through every lecture and moment
Whether you’re moving between lecture halls, spending hours in the library or commuting across town, battery life matters. The 7000mAh battery keeps you connected throughout the day!
Smart convenience at a glance
The itel A300+’s standout feature is its 2.01-inch Smart Secondary Screen. It lets you quickly view notifications, control your music, personalise watch faces and even preview selfies using the rear camera—all without constantly unlocking your phone.
It’s a smarter, faster way to stay connected while keeping distractions to a minimum.

Built for everyday Life
Life can be unpredictable. From rushing between classes to unexpected rain showers, students need a phone that can handle everyday challenges. With IP65 dust and water resistance, the itel A300+ is built to offer added confidence wherever the day takes you.
When it’s time to relax, the hole-punch display and dual speakers provide an immersive experience for streaming, gaming and enjoying your favourite content.
Get the itel A300+ Now
Whether you’re preparing for a new semester or simply looking for a smartphone that can keep up with your daily routine, the itel A300+ offers the right balance of innovation, performance and convenience.
Visit your nearest itel Home Store today, Click HERE or check out a retail store near you and experience the itel A300+. Plus, enjoy FREE 1GB on your MTN line and 50% bonus data on every recharge for the next six months when you purchase the device.

-
Audio10 years agoPage – Day Break Everywhere Burst
-
Audio5 years agoShadykarz – Forever
-
Audio10 years agoJuniorboy ft. 9ice – IRAPADA
-
Entertainment Gists6 years agoEx-Beauty Queen, Sandra Benede Shares Sexy Photo
-
Audio5 years agoSimi – Happy Birthday ft. Adekunle Gold, DeJa
-
Audio5 years agoRuger – Bounce
-
Mixtapes4 years agoMixtape: DJ DimpleNipple – The Best Of Amapiano Thrills
-
Editorials4 years agoSa’eedah Imam On Creating Her Imprint In The Nigerian Music Industry As An Emerging Creative Writer

